{"id":462,"date":"2018-07-08T03:24:23","date_gmt":"2018-07-08T03:24:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.creationevidence.org\/blog\/?p=462"},"modified":"2019-07-20T20:26:35","modified_gmt":"2019-07-20T20:26:35","slug":"creation-devotional-june-21-paleontology","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.creationevidence.org\/blog\/creation-devotional-june-21-paleontology\/","title":{"rendered":"Creation Devotional June 21 - Paleontology"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Daily Devotional \u2013 June 21<\/p>\n<p>Paleontology<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The following commentary on the fossil record appeared in World Magazine:<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Darwin, while not having the benefit of cellular technology that is available to scientists today, did recognize that the fossil record posed a problem. He wrote, \u201cWhy then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain, and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be raised against my theory.\u201d 2 Unfortunately for Darwinists, the fossil record still does not support evolution, but it does fit [a biblical viewpoint].<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Jonathan Wells, a biologist who holds Ph.D. degrees from both Yale University and the University of California, Berkeley, has written a book, Icons of Evolution, which demonstrates that much of what is taught about evolution is wrong or even fraudulent. Wells notes, \u201cAlthough the abrupt appearance of animal fossils in the Cambrian [period] was known to Darwin, the full extent of the phenomenon wasn\u2019t appreciated until the 1980s.\u201d 3 He further notes, \u201cThe fossil evidence is so strong, and the event so dramatic, that it has become known as the \u2018Cambrian explosion,\u2019 or \u2018biology\u2019s big bang.\u2019\u201d 4 Thus, the fossil record does not support the theory that living things developed gradually over long periods of time, but instead appeared rather abruptly in their present form. Henry Gee, chief science writer for Nature, is quoted by Wells as saying, \u201cTo take a line of fossils and claim that they represent a lineage is not a scientific hypothesis that can be tested, but an assertion that carries the same validity as a bedtime story\u2014amusing, perhaps even instructive, but not scientific.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.<\/p>\n<p>~ Colossians 2:8<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Source: \"Pearls in Paradise\" by authors Bruce Malone and Jule Von Vett<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.creationevidence.org\/documents\/creation_devotional_references.pdf\">References<\/a> for this devotional.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Daily Devotional \u2013 June 21 Paleontology &nbsp; The following commentary on the fossil record appeared in World Magazine: &nbsp; Darwin, while not having the benefit of cellular technology that is available to scientists today, did recognize that the fossil record posed a problem. He wrote, \u201cWhy then is not every geological formation and every stratum [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[47],"tags":[4,50],"class_list":["post-462","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-creation-daily-devotional","tag-creation","tag-paleontology"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.creationevidence.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/462","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.creationevidence.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.creationevidence.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.creationevidence.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.creationevidence.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=462"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.creationevidence.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/462\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1153,"href":"https:\/\/www.creationevidence.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/462\/revisions\/1153"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.creationevidence.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=462"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.creationevidence.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=462"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.creationevidence.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=462"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}